Smarter targeting of which palms to inspect.

AI-based visual screening for Ganoderma (basal stem rot) — an offline Android app and management dashboard for plantation workers, agronomists and management.

  • Green Routine monitoring
  • Yellow Verify
  • Red Inspect first
GanoAI offline screening
Centre and frond detection

Centre & frond detection

Shorter / irregular fronds flagged

Visual analysis result

Verification required

Palm B-12 · GPS logged

AI that shows your team which palms to inspect first

GanoAI is an agritech solution developed by Tkraf that enables fast and efficient Ganoderma screening through a smartphone app. Its AI model is trained with expert input to support screening accuracy and help plantations identify palms that require further PCR testing in a laboratory. This targeted approach helps save time, optimize testing costs, and support informed decisions on palm health.

Vision

To shape a future where technology empowers every oil palm plantation to stay ahead of Ganoderma, safeguarding productivity and long-term sustainability.

Mission

To equip oil palm plantations with fast, objective, and affordable Ganoderma scanning technology, enabling informed decisions and timely, targeted action to protect palm health.

  • Offline Android app

    Field officers photograph each palm; analysis runs on the phone, no signal needed.

  • Crown-geometry AI

    Computer vision measures frond direction, spacing and crown symmetry.

  • Order triage

    Green / yellow / red priority, with photo and GPS for every palm.

  • Management dashboard

    Maps, review queues and history from block to region level.

Aerial view of an oil palm plantation
By the time the eye can see it, the palm is already lost — and the fungus keeps spreading to neighbours through root contact.

Ganoderma is a silent killer of oil palm

  • USD 500Mestimated yearly losses to basal stem rot for producers in Southeast Asia
  • 60–70%of tissue already infected when the first visible symptoms appear
  • 3–5 yrslife expectancy of a mature palm once infected — a total loss of yield
  • 860,610 haof mature oil palm projected to be wiped out in Malaysia by 2040

Sources: Remote Sensing (MDPI) 2022, 14(5):1239 · Frontiers in Plant Science 2023, 10.3389/fpls.2023.1156869

Millions of palms. Too little expert time

Hypothetical example for a large plantation — to be tailored with partner data.

40,000hectares of plantation
5.7 Moil palms (≈143 per ha)
5agronomists available
1.14 Mpalms per agronomist

≈ 4,560

palms per agronomist, every working day, just to look at each palm once a year (250 working days).

The obstacle is not agronomic expertise.

The number of palms far exceeds the daily capacity for in-depth inspection — so census becomes rushed, sampling becomes random, and early cases slip through.

Today's detection methods each leave a costly gap

Agronomist visual census

Human eyes in the field

The gap

  • Symptoms only visible at 60–70% tissue infection
  • Subjective — results vary inspector to inspector
  • 5 agronomists cannot cover 5.7 M palms
Cost
High labour cost
Accuracy
Late & inconsistent

PCR lab test

Molecular confirmation

The gap

  • Expensive, laborious stem sampling + lab work
  • Days to results; not usable in the field
  • Impossible to run on millions of palms
Cost
Highest cost per palm
Accuracy
Accurate — but per sample only

Satellite / remote sensing

Imagery from above

The gap

  • Coarse resolution, cloud cover, long waits
  • Weak at early stage — 57% test accuracy in a UAV study
  • Confuses disease with nutrient deficiency
Cost
Moderate cost, wide area
Accuracy
Not tree-level reliable

Sources: Frontiers in Plant Science 2023; Remote Sensing (MDPI) 2022, 14(5):1239.

Screen every palm first. Experts make the call

AI results set inspection priority — they do not declare a definitive disease status. Every palm gets a colour, a photo and a GPS point.

  1. Green

    Low indication

    Stays under routine monitoring. Does not mean proven infection-free.

  2. Yellow

    Verification required

    An anomaly, or the AI is not yet certain. Enters the review queue.

  3. Red

    High priority

    Strong visual indication that needs prompt review by an expert.

Measuring crown patterns, not guessing a diagnosis

Computer vision converts visual characteristics into traceable, repeatable screening signals.

  1. 01

    Frond geometry

    Direction, distance and angular distribution of every frond from the crown centre.

  2. 02

    Crown asymmetry

    Detects imbalance in growth direction — a visible stress pattern of basal stem rot.

  3. 03

    Patterns of change

    Compares observations of the same palm across census rounds.

  4. 04

    Triage priority

    Converts signals into an inspection order for agronomists.

From one photo to a documented decision

Designed to slot into the existing plantation census — no new team, no new hardware beyond an Android phone.

  1. 01

    Photo officer

    Captures the crown from 4 sides following the initial SOP.

  2. 02

    AI screening

    Crown pattern & geometry processed on the phone itself.

  3. 03

    Priority

    Green / yellow / red, stored with photo and GPS.

  4. 04

    Agronomist

    Field inspection, follow-up and documentation.

Offline by design Scan deep in the estate with no signal — data syncs automatically when a connection returns.

Same budget: 143,000 palms screened vs 84 PCR tests

PCR lab test

Rp 708,000

per palm sample — DNA isolation + PCR, lab fee only

≈1,700×cheaper per palm

GanoAI screening

≈ Rp 600

per palm per census round (Rp 80,000/ha ÷ 143 palms)

What Rp 60 M buys · 1,000 ha, one round

GanoAI 143,000 palms screened
PCR 84 palms tested

Around one hotspot · 100 m ≈ 450 palms

PCR on every palm
Rp 318.6 M
GanoAI screen + PCR on flagged 10%
Rp 32.0 M

≈ 90% lower lab spend per hotspot

PCR price: Universitas Brawijaya Rector Regulation No. 66/2024, industry rate for DNA isolation + PCR; excludes stem sampling, labour, primers and transport. GanoAI price excludes VAT, onboarding and devices. 10% flag rate is illustrative. GanoAI targets PCR — it does not replace it.

Put expert hours and PCR budget where it counts

Palms needing in-depth expert inspection per census round

Illustration for 5.7 M palms, assuming 10% are flagged yellow/red

Blanket inspection 5,700,000
With GanoAI triage 570,000
10×

fewer palms for agronomists to inspect in depth — more time and better judgment on each high-risk palm.

PCR savings formula

Samples safely reduced × actual cost per sample

GanoAI does not replace PCR — it targets it. Reductions are applied only after missed-case risk is assessed.

Layered accuracy: AI reach + expert eyes + PCR

  1. 1

    GanoAI screens every palm

    Objective crown-geometry measurement. The same photo gives the same score — no fatigue, no inspector-to-inspector variation.

  2. 2

    Agronomists verify yellow & red

    Expert eyes on far fewer, higher-risk palms: more time per palm means better field judgment.

  3. 3

    PCR confirms targeted samples

    Lab certainty where it changes decisions — including green control samples.

What your company gets

  • Coverage of every palm, not a random sample
  • PCR-grade certainty where decisions are made
  • Fewer missed cases from rushed census
  • Auditable record: photo, GPS, score, review

Each layer does what it is best at — the combined system is more accurate and far cheaper than any single method used alone.

Field trial experiment: documentation

Ganoderma palms

Fruiting bodies at the stem base
Tagged Palm · Ganoderma Palm
Expert inspects the stem base

Healthy palms

Tagged Palm · 11 Oct · Healthy
Expert verifies the tagged palm

Every palm tagged

Palm ID, sampling date & time and expert status (sakit / tidak sakit) recorded on site.

Blind comparison

Expert assessment is recorded independently, then compared with GanoAI screening.

Positives and controls

Symptomatic palms are tested alongside healthy controls in the same estate.

Tested with experts. Measured with agreed KPIs

  1. Preliminary blind test

    GanoAI vs agronomist assessment on a set of palms.

  2. Follow-up evaluation

    Consistency of results and field workflow readiness.

  3. Cross-plantation validation

    Independent controls + PCR samples + different plantations.

  • Sensitivity

    Share of reference-positive palms flagged yellow or red.

  • Productivity

    Analysable palms per staff-hour, incl. retakes and walking.

  • Missed cases

    False negatives estimated in independently checked green samples.

  • Realistic cost

    Cost per screened palm, equipment readiness, value scenarios.

Let's put it to the test on your plantation.

3 agreements to start the pilot

  1. Select 2–3 blocks and a field supervisor
  2. Agree on the expert method, PCR protocol and KPIs
  3. Finalise pilot schedule, logistics and costs